Today's Date: Add To Favorites
NY appeals court orders NJ programmer's acquittal
Headline Legal News | 2012/02/17 11:03
A federal appeals court on Friday reversed the conviction of a former Goldman Sachs programmer on charges he stole computer code, ordering an acquittal in a case that tested the boundaries of what can be considered a crime as companies seek to protect their intellectual property from competitors.

The unusually speedy mandate from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan will result in freedom for Sergey Aleynikov, of North Caldwell, N.J. He has been in prison since he was sentenced in March to more than eight years in prison. He was convicted in December 2010 of stealing trade secrets and transporting stolen property in interstate and foreign commerce.

A three-judge appeals panel heard arguments on Thursday, but the judges gave no indication that they would reverse the lower court hours later with a terse, one-paragraph order. The 2nd Circuit said it would issue a written ruling "in due course" to explain its decision.

Aleynikov's attorney, Kevin Marino, said he spoke with his client Friday. He said Aleynikov reacted by concluding: "There is justice in the world."

"I could not be happier," Marino said. "It's justice because Sergey Aleynikov did not commit either of the crimes with which he was charged. The government's attempt to stretch this criminal federal statute beyond all recognition resulted in a grave injustice that put Sergey Aleynikov in prison for a year."

In arguments before the 2nd Circuit on Thursday, Marino called it "ridiculous" and "preposterous" that his client was facing eight years in prison because he was found to have information that was not a product that Goldman Sachs sold in interstate and foreign commerce. A prosecutor had asked the court to uphold the conviction, saying protection of trade secrets was the only way companies could retain their technological advantages.



[PREV] [1] ..[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].. [1053] [NEXT]



All
Legal News
Law Firm News
Attorney News
Headline Legal News
Lawyer Blog
Legal Business
Court News
Court Watch
Legal Interview
Topics in Legal News
Press Release
Opinions
Legal Marketing
Politics & Legal
Law School News
Texas high court orders state to..
Top Pa. judge charged with campa..
Appeals court upholds key voting..
Md. highest court recognizes sam..
Court rules NY town's prayer vio..
German sues Macedonia in EU huma..
Court won't consider giving man ..
High court's stance could spur i..
Chinese court seeking to mediate..
Court to decide if deportation r..
Court Rules For Private Lawyer H..
Co-worker to pay 5 NJ men millio..
Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP Ann..
Vegas woman skips court in sciss..
Ohioan to plead guilty to defrau..
Gov't files $25B mortgage settle..
Suit challenges federal licensin..
Justice Dept opposes Texas voter..
Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP Ann..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Indianapolis Trial Lawyers
Riley Bennett & Egloff
Indiana Trial Lawyers
www.rbelaw.com
Eugene personal injury lawyer
Eugene DUI, Criminal Defense. Call (541) 338-9111
www.arnoldlawfirm.com
Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorneys
Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorneys
www.mgalaw.com
Indiana business litigation attorney
Price Waicukauski & Riley
Indiana Class Action
www.price-law.com
Oregon Criminal Defense
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Coit & Associates, P.C.
www.criminaldefenseoregon.com
Pittsburgh DUI Laywer
Pennsylvania DUI Lawyer
DUI. Call (412) 429-4360
www.gbmlawpittsburgh.com
Houston Auto Accident Lawyers
Houston truck accident attorneys
Houston insurance claim
www.hurtinhouston.com
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Sydney criminal defence lawyers
Criminal Barristers and Solicitors
www.criminallaw.com.au
 
 
Disclaimer: The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Romeo Media as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation.