| 
                  
                    |  |  
                    |  |  
                    |  |  
                    | Jury Rules Against Blue Nile in $60.1 Million Lawsuit Legal Business |    
                      2009/11/02 09:36
 
 |  
                    | 
                      
                        | Following a six-day trial, a federal jury here dismissed Blue Nile Inc.'s $60.1 million claim against The Yehuda Diamond
 Company, reaffirming Yehuda Diamond's right to compare the prices of its
 clarity enhanced diamonds to the untreated diamonds sold by online retailer
 Blue Nile.
 
 Yehuda Diamond, based in New York, has earned widespread industry and consumer
 loyalty for its successful competition with Blue Nile and other online
 jewelers, favoring consumers not only with lower prices but also with
 unsurpassed expert face-to-face service and full Federal Trade
 Commission-compliant disclosure.
 
 The suit [No. C-07-2017 TSZ], brought by Blue Nile and heard last month in
 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, involved Blue
 Nile's efforts to prevent Yehuda Diamond from comparing the price and
 appearance of its clarity enhanced diamonds to those natural untreated
 diamonds sold by Blue Nile.
 
 Yehuda Diamond has consistently contended, even before Blue Nile filed the
 lawsuit against it in December 2007, that Yehuda Diamond's price comparisons
 are in the best interest of consumers.  After 4-1/2 hours of deliberations,
 the jury agreed, dismissing both Blue Nile's federal and state claims that
 Yehuda Diamond had engaged in false or misleading advertising.
 
 Blue Nile, which has brought multiple lawsuits against smaller competitors
 over the past decade, had petitioned the jury to award it exemplary damages of
 $60,161,834.64, based on alleged actual damages of $20,053,944.88.
 
 "This is a momentous victory for all consumers and for free-market
 competition," says Dror Yehuda, president of Yehuda Diamonds.
 
 "In essence, the jury told Blue Nile that it can't use its massive size and
 legal muscle to prevent consumers from learning about lower-priced, quality
 alternatives to Blue Nile diamonds," explains Mr. Yehuda.  "In recent years,
 Blue Nile has preferred to fight its competitors in the courtroom than in the
 marketplace."
 
 The jury's decision clears the path for Yehuda Diamond to continue to inform
 consumers of how much they stand to save by shopping at Yehuda Diamond
 authorized retailers, who offer competitive prices along with personalized,
 expert, face-to-face customer service for its clarity enhanced diamonds.  By
 comparison, Blue Nile untreated diamonds are frequently higher-priced and Blue
 Nile bypasses the retail distribution chain altogether.
 
 Moreover, Mr. Yehuda vowed that his company will continue to press its own
 lawsuit against Blue Nile [Court Case #08-CV-9751] filed in November 2008 in
 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
 
 In that ongoing case, Yehuda Diamond contends that consumers who purchased
 rubies, emeralds, sapphires or jewelry containing those stones from Blue Nile
 were not informed that the gemstones had been treated to enhance their
 appearance.
 
 
 |  |  |  | Page rank |  |  |  | 
 |  
 |  
|  |  
 | 
                
                  |  |  
                  | 
| Law Firm Web Design Information |  
| Law Promo has worked with attorneys, lawyers and law firms all over the world in designing beautiful law firm websites that look great on all devices, from desktop computers to mobile phones. Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive law firm website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the mobile world. Solo Practice Law Firm Website Design |  |  |